- Association for Purchasing & Supply

candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Home
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) About APS
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Join APS
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Contact us

candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Purchasing & Supply Links
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) APS Updates
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Develop your network
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) APS Recruitment
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Publications
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Partnership Prospects
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Training & Seminars
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Consultancy
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Library
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Articles of Interest
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) Salary Survey
candledot.jpg (2069 bytes) N.C.B PMI

    Login >>>


MEMBERS

blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Ireland
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Slovakia
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Great Britain
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Spain Brazil
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) N. Ireland
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Germany
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Malaysia
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) France
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) New Zealand
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Chile
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Italy
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Switzerland
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Croatia
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Norway
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Australia
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) USA
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Sweden
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) India
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Chile
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Brazil
blueopaldot.jpg (2200 bytes) Finland


     Int'l
bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) NAPM
bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) Cips
bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) IPSERA
bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) CAPS
bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) NIGP
bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) IFPMM

bluetilde.jpg (2753 bytes) APICS


APS Updates
Register free for your email automatic  >>>

 

.

While e-Procurement is a commonly used phrase, I'm wondering what does it mean in real terms for purchasing professionals.  For example in the simplest form registering for one of our (Association for Purchasing & Supply) training seminars on-line is an example of e-Procurement

TYPES OF PROCUREMENT
There are 3 main types of Procurement within commercial organisations

  1. Indirect,
  2. Direct,
  3. Sourcing.

INDIRECT PROCUREMENT 
Indirect Procurement can be defined as the purchase of non-production goods i.e. goods that are not the raw materials of a finished product the company may produce.

Typically this type of procurement refers to the purchase of items such as:

  •  Paper

  • Pens

  • Chairs

  • Desks

  • Computers

  • Maintenance and Repair of same;

  • Temporary Labour, Business Travel etc.

Indirect procurement can account for (Best Practices in e-Procurement, The Abridged Report-EMEA)

  • ‘30% to 35% of a typical manufacturers expenditure and,
  • Businesses spend nearly €7.9 trillion on indirect goods and services, per annum, worldwide’

As a general rule, spend on Indirect Procurement has been badly managed, paper-based in process and encouraging of maverick
spending.

DIRECT PROCUREMENT
Direct Procurement can be described as the purchase of those goods and services, which are part of the raw materials leading to the production of a finished good.
Examples might be paper for a poster manufacturer, plastic for a credit card producer.  Although not as badly controlled and managed as Indirect Procurement, the increased management control provided by an automated procurement system could yield extra gains in the areas of price and quality.

SOURCING
Sourcing involves the identification, evaluation and negotiation of products and services for both indirect and direct procurement processes.

WHAT IS E-COMMERCE
e-Commerce can be defined as commerce (the buying and selling of goods) conducted electronically (e), on the Internet (An interconnected system of networks that connects computers around the world via the TCP/IP protocol). [http://www.pcwebopedia.com/]

WHAT IS E-PROCUREMENT
'At the highest level, Internet-based procurement (e-Procurement) creates private, Web-based procurement markets that automate communications, transactions, and collaboration between supply chain partners.' (Best Practices in e-Procurement, The Abridged Report-EMEA)

More simply put, e-Procurement involves the purchasing of goods for an organisation via the Internet.

The difference between e-Commerce and e-Procurement is that e-Commerce describes generically selling/buying via the Internet
whereas e-Procurement defines more specifically the purchasing of goods for a specific organisation e-Procurement requires certain software and hardware in order to operate.

Some companies have chosen to create bespoke systems in-house. However most companies have chosen to buy an e-Procurement Software house’s application and adapt it for their own needs, due to the increased speed of implementation by not having to build the system from scratch. Typical e-Procurement systems allow users to buy items listed in on-line catalogues pre-provided by the companies suppliers.

These catalogues have been taken from strategically sourced company-approved suppliers who have been enabled to feed into the particular e-Procurement software.

Most e-procurement projects will state this as the preferred route.  However in practice, to broaden use of the system and accelerate some of the productivity savings, a number of organisations are adopting commodities that have not been strategically sourced.  The view is that the e-procurement toll will provide them with the spend Management Information (M.I.) to strategically source the item at a later date.

The e-Procurement software is a browser based system which includes the company specific buying rules e.g. Fred Jones is allowed to buy items up to €10,000 but Joe Smith is allowed to buy items up to €100,000.
An approval flow allows more senior approvers to approve expenditure outside personal limits for those lower down the chain.
'The whole process is designed to enforce on-contract purchasing, ensuring that the company takes advantage of the prices it has negotiated and eliminates inadvertent spending with other vendors' (In a Perfect e-Procurement World)

e-Procurement should lead to cost savings by allowing organisations to co-ordinate spend and use this mass-buying to influence supplier contracts and pricing therefore increasing buying power. It should also decrease the amount of maverick spending that takes place thereby reducing processing costs in relation to invoices. Processing costs should also drop in relation to catalogue management, order placement, order fulfilment and payment. Another effect of introducing an e-Procurement solution may be that processing staff requirements may be reduced.

'The average mid-sized company has trimmed $2 million from its procurement costs by automating purchasing and processing’ and that ‘manual processing of purchase orders costs the typical company $121, compared with only $33 for an online purchase’. (E-Procurement Shaves Costs)

There appears to be a vast array of egar and willing organisations ready at the drop of a hat to assist in the implementation of  streamlined, confidential and secure systems. 

There are many ways to e-Procure. The references I have given should help in identifying the different types.

In summary:
SME's can access e-Procurement by accessing directly to a supplier website (simplest form and not really e-Procurement) to accessing an hosted e-Procurement site (ref: http://www.noie.gov.au/Projects/ecommerce/SME/)

Large businesses can generally purchase e-Procurement software directly and either adapt it for their own needs using in-house staff or employing contractors such as IBM.

I wonder though do these facility providers know what the limits and limitations of the technology are, let alone their poor clients.  The only source of e-procurement implementation information, that is widely available appears to originate from the service providers who with the most honest of hearts are bias towards their particular solution(s). Although It must be said that they are also the leaders in the field. Being a pragmatic individual I am interested in finding out the nuts and bolts of what is involved, without the 'gloss'.  How long is that piece of string ?

E-PROCUREMENT LIMITATIONS
As one would suspect the facility providers know what the limitations of the technology are and know that their clients platforms (especially networks) are, generally, not completely up-to-scratch - but as commercial organisations, they - let me put this tactfully - may not be fully communicative regarding some slight drawbacks.

In terms of getting relatively unbiased advice - the following 2 reports may assist:

·         BEST PRACTICES IN E-PROCUREMENT, THE ABRIDGED REPORT

[Aberdeen Group, Boston, Massachusetts. December 2001, Best Practices in e-Procurement, The Abridged Report [Online], Available: http://216.183.121.142/reports/eprocurement/e-ProcurementAbridged.pdf [Accessed 12 Jan 2002]]

·         BEST PRACTICES IN E-PROCUREMENT, THE ABRIDGED REPORT-EMEA

 [Aberdeen Group, Boston, Massachusetts. December 2001, Best Practices in e-Procurement - EMEA, The Abridged Report [Online]. Available: http://216.183.121.142/reports/emea/e-ProcurementEurope.pdf [Accessed 12 Jan 2002]]

The following reference may give you an insight into problems encountered:

  • E-Procurement: Problems Behind The Promise

http://www.informationweek.com/813/eprocure.htm Last Accessed 22/2/02]

 

BUSINESS ISSUES REGARDING E-PROCUREMENT

BEST PRACTICE
Of 11 companies who have implemented e-Procurement, the following is suggested in terms of Best Practice (Best Practices in e-Procurement, The Abridged Report-EMEA).

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT
By  viewing e-Procurement as a business rather than an IT tool one can align the project aims in the correct direction i.e. a strategic business tool for business process improvement.

By creating a good business case, after carrying out a thorough investigation of the existing business processes, and thereafter planning a fast implementation, the e-Procurement implementation should roll out rapidly thereby ensuring a fast Return on Investment (ROI).

ONGOING
By improving the accuracy of invoicing, with the aid of the e-Procurement solution, late payment penalties to suppliers may be reduced or even eliminated. The only way to ensure that happens is by constant benchmarking[4] in order to monitor supplier delivery dates and times, versus required delivery dates and times.

One should also monitor the success of the e-Procurement implementation and programme by using a pre-determined benchmarking programme.

Purchasing processes should be standardised where possible, throughout the organisation, to benefit from cost savings.

AFTER INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION
Deep integration into legacy systems should be a high priority project goal.

It is also important to ensure that e-Procurement is used throughout the organisation and is accepted as the sole purchasing system.

In order to aid the integration and acceptance, a methodology should be drawn up which can be used for regional implementations based on initial e-procurement project experiences and feedback from pilot sites.

GENERAL
By creating a well resourced catalogue maintenance team the necessary updates to supplier catalogues on the e-procurement system will take place smoothly. If this team is not well resourced the benefits in terms of up-to-date prices and service will not filter through to the users and therefore the cost savings will be reduced.

Organisations should work with the technology vendor i.e. in XXXXX (My Company)'S case ARIBA, in order to develop functionality, of the e-Procurement solution, for future releases.

SUCCESS FACTORS FOR E-PROCUREMENT

The success factors for installation of an e-Procurement system are as follows (Deloitte & Touche. E-Procurement):

By viewing e-Procurement as a business strategy one can aim to ensure the reasons the solution is being implemented are the correct ones i.e. business process reasons rather than a desire to be the most technically advanced amongst ones peers.

Without knowing what an organisation currently spends, and how they spend it, it is very difficult to quantify if the new procurement solution has been a success. Therefore gathering data prior to commencement of the e-Procurement implementation is vital.

Planning how, where and why regional implementations are going to take place is vital as at each stage monitoring of the success must take place and it is only by monitoring each region, post implementation, that one can learn for the future.

One must know one's existing business processes, and be willing to change them, in order to truly benefit from the overall organisational change that should take place as a result of installing the solution.

Senior management must accept that e-Procurement is vital to the success of the business and must champion the project in order for those lower down the chain to truly accept that e-procurement is the future of the purchasing process within their organisation.

Users must also accept that e-Procurement will bring benefits to them. It is the responsibility of the change managers to ensure that users understand the benefits that they will receive from the e-Procurement solution.

Departmental champions must be identified as these champions will manage the roll-out on a local level to the regions. Without these local champions an attitude of ‘it's not built heremay arise and therefore the solution may not be as readily accepted.

Gaining buy-in from suppliers is vital. It should not be under-estimated the length of time that they will need in order to produce on-line catalogues even if they have a commercial website at first contact. Their current commercial website is unlikely to be compatible with the chosen e-Procurement solution

Identification of the commodities which will offer the biggest savings, in the shortest period, is also vital. Without an attributable saving early in the project, both from a process and price point of view, users may not accept the savings the solution can provide. This may lead to staff, exposed to the implementation plan, not buying into the overall strategy.

As e-Procurement is being rolled out, one has to confirm that benefits are flowing through. The only way to do this is to measure things such as

·        User adoption;

·        Contract compliance;

·        Process improvements;

·        Cost savings;

·        Supplier performance.

(Best Practices in e-Procurement, The Abridged Report-EMEA)


OTHER GOOD REFERENCES

  • Business Pioneers, E-Procurement: OK to Be No. 2

http://www.itworld.com/App/462/CWSTO58093/ Last Accessed 22/2/02]

http://www.lq.ca/issues/dec99/articles/article13.html Last Accessed 22/2/02]

  • e-Procurement: A Pragmatic Look at Supply Chain Automation Via the Internet

http://b2b.ebizq.net/scm/coleman_1.html Last Accessed 22/2/02]

  • e-Procurement – Evaluating the Opportunities. A BuyIT Checklist

http://www.buyitnet.org/guidance/guidelines/eproc/eproc-checklist/printer.html Last Accessed 22/2/02]

http://www.purchasing-consultants.co.uk/e-commerce%20&%20technology%20bookshelf.htm Last Accessed 22/2/02]

http://www.informationweek.com/813/eprocure.htm Last Accessed 22/2/02]

  • In a Perfect e-Procurement World

http://www.gartner.com/webletter/cardonet/article1/article1.html Last Accessed 22/2/02]

  • IBM’s e-procurement strategy

http://www-1.ibm.com/procurement/html/eprocurement/eprocurementstrategy.html Last Accessed 22/2/02]

  • Study: E-procurement still in early stages

http://www.itworld.com/Man/2672/IDG010417eprocurement/ Last Accessed 22/2/02 Last Accessed 22/2/02]

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/html/StockStory.cfm?DID=6086 Last Accessed 22/2/02 Last Accessed 22/2/02]

  • Success Factors for e-Procurement: Enabling Buyer and Supplier Connectivity

http://www.hurwitz.com/primaryresearch/eprocurementoverview.html Last Accessed 22/2/02]

 

   

Understanding 
Supply Chain Event Management
One of the newest morsels on the tech industry's buffet of buzzwords is Supply Chain Event Management (SCEM). And though, in the past, enterprise software buyers seemingly displayed an insatiable appetite for the latest acronym, times have changed. A tighter economy and jaded IT community have analysts trying harder to define SCEM and corporate managers working diligently to understand whether or not they need it.

Unlike CRM and some other popular "techronyms," SCEM hasn't ballooned into an all-encompassing category of its own with blurry boundaries. Analysts appear to agree that MORE >